Utilitarianism V. Kantianism

Ethics can be defined as the sure criticism on our moral beliefs with the aim of improving, extending or better those beliefs in some way. (Dodds, Lecture 2) Kantian moral system and Utilitarianism be two theories that attempt to answer the ethical nature of kind-hearted beings. This paper testament attempt to explain how and why Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism differ as well as discuss why I believe Kants theory provides a more plausible account of ethics. Immanuel Kants deonotological ethical theory assesses if serves ar moral based on the individuals will or heart of acting. Kants theory can be categorized as a deonotological because movements are not assessed to be morally permissible on the basis of consequences they produce, but rather on the form of the agents will in acting, (Dodds, Lecture 7) therefore his actions are based on duty and not consequential. Kantianism is based on three beliefs: maxims, willing, and the insipid imperative. Kant states t hat a maxim is a general rule or precept which will explain what a person takes himself to be doing and the circumstances in which he takes himself to be doing it (Feldman, 1999, 201). It is important that this principle be universalisable and that the maxim can be applied systematically to everyone that encounters similar situations, therefore willed as a universal law. The befriend aspect of Kants theory is willing. This involves the agent consistently committing oneself to make an action occur. He states that, In general, we can say that a person wills inconsistently if he wills that p be the chemise and he wills that q be the typesetters case and its impossible for p and q to be the case together (Feldman, 1999, 203). The last aspect of Kants theory is the categorical imperative. The grandeur of the categorical... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay,! visit our page: write my paper