Legal Actiobn toys vs Amazon Essay

1. Based on my question and as tumesce as from reading the aspect for each conpeverys arguments that Toys R Us entangle that there was a spoil of pore because of Amazon.com took on an new(prenominal) political party to sell toys and Toys R Us matte that they were sole third party for this. They matte up like the contract was demote also because Amazon.com did not follow the organization. But Amazon.com felt that Toys R Us breach contract because they could not keep up with the ingest of supplies and the levels of the demand. They felt this because Toys R Us could not keep products in line of merchandises especially during the holidays. The assess ruling saying that both parties breach the agreement and saying that neither parties leave get nothing is adqueate. In mhy opinion, I would stand also terminate the agreement and not award any indemnity to either party because I feeling that they both the agreement and they both were wrong.2. I feel the outline for the a vails and dis receiptss that Amazon.com would wealthy person considered to begin with making any agreement with Toys R Us would be they would puzzle suss out to see if they shadower keep up with the demand of the customers and to make sure that they can harbour all the products in stock as well. I believe that an advantage was that Toys R Us knew a share about the Toy Marketing and what customers treasured. I also call back that another advantage would be that Amazon.com was getting a contribution of the sales. I do feel that if Amazon.com had any doubts that they should contract waited and done more research into Toys R Us. I also think that Amazon.com was confident and did not have any problems with going into an agreement with them, but if they knew that they were considering other Merchantss, that Amazon.com should have let Toys R Us get by before signing agreement, so they could work a better palm with them.3. Some recommendations that I would have do to Amazon.co m that would have realizeed both companies would be is that they should have looked at the sales that was coming in. I also would have also told them that they did to treasure what Toys R Us would have disjointed as well not retributive them. I would have have agree to half what was able asked instead of what they pay. I would have also said possibly we can give it another scissure and see what Toys R Us wanted when it comes to other merchants that was selling toys as well. They likely could have come up with a better agreement. Maybe include that they could have gotten a better deal with working(a) along side with the other merchants and maybe the profits would have been better.4. I would have kept it going because since was highly lucky shoe retailer. It could have benefited Amazon.com a lot. This stylus that it could have brought money that was being wooly-minded when the agreement was terminated with Toys R Us. I would have kept the have becaise it was well thou ght out and it was doing so well. Amazon.com could have done a lot with Zappos and that it could have brought more customers and that it could have been a immense profit in. I know for me if I would have brought Zappos that I would have do sure that Zappos would stay caterpillar tread and that my customers would know that there was a place for them to give away at to get shoes from. I also feel that it could have benefit from Amazon.com. Amazon.com could have showed the person or persons who was running it ways to better it, if Amazon.com felt that the form was not good. This would have been good for both.