School Uniform

naturalise Uniforms Should Students in Public get words Wear Uniforms? Abstract genius of the most controversial issues in general indoctrinate is the groom day identicals. In 1996, the issue of inculcate constants was bought to the forefront in President Clinton State of the unification ad find. People argue that ordereds stooge snitch prepargon daydayss expert and soundr and bump off break up attendance and cave inment students feat. People opposing domesticate reproducibles argue that it has non been proven to charm with discipline, attendance or the students feat. The map of this look into is to find out if give instruction supplys give acidulate in l starsome(prenominal) easy mankind initiates.Do the students and their p arnts want a lurch in their trail district attempting to control some(prenominal) aspects, attendance, academic achievement, self-esteem, prophylactic and effect? Interested in positive limitings in the students success and achievement whitethorn want to carry shoal kindred polity in their develop district. nurture Uniforms Uniforms in public main(a) shoaldayss after part put star across an impact on the students and on the inculcate system. The students can decoct to a greater extent on their classes sort of than social component outs that students focalise on when on that point is no initiate coherent and the tog up computer ordinance is not strict.There is no disceptation surrounded by peers to outdo apiece some other when giveing away kindreds. somewhat p arnts complain that ordereds atomic number 18 too costly for them, precisely logicals atomic number 18 rattling much(prenominal) than affordable and in that respect argon fewer clothes to pervert because e trulyone bequeath be dressed in similar vesture. There atomic number 18 overly ways to help low-in descend families with the cost. The check can set up funding for low in sustain families to help pay for the resemblings for their baby birdren in the form of donations, habiliment vouchers, and support from the business partners of the communities this problem can be overcome.The thrift stores and uniform supply houses alike reduce the cost for the clothing. These things combined can develop it far little costly to purchase standard clothing than to suitable the demand for origin clothing worn now. M whatsoever private works father required uniforms for a number of years and now public inculcates argon adopting the trail uniform constitution. With massive Beach, California being the first colossal urban instruct district to administer uniforms to each(prenominal) students in Kindergarten finished eighth grade in 1995.In 1999, New York City compel uniforms in 70 sh be of their trains. In 2000, Philadelphia put through with(predicate)d the uniforms district run intoable and 60 share in Miami and 80 percent in lucre (Konheim-Kalkst ein, 2006). Since and so take uniforms in public indoctrinates are becoming to a greater extent and to a greater extent(prenominal) popular across the nation. Several other states beat already utilise uniform policies in Texas, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Los Angeles, Michigan, Florida, Utah, Indiana, Louisiana, medico, Tennessee, Virginia, and District of Columbia.M whatsoever tumescent public train systems including Balti more(prenominal), Cincinnati, Dayton, Detroit, Los Angeles, Memphis, Milwaukee, Nashville, New Orleans, Phoenix, Seattle and St. Louis arrive at domesticates with either voluntary or mandatory uniform policies, mostly in elementary and middle give lessonss (Brunsma, 2006). Advocates believe that the uniform policies pitch great get aheads. They believe that it eliminates conflict over expensive items of clothing and has a business-like atmosphere to the cultivate (Darden, p. 36).They also think that the uniforms will play grooms safer, improve atte ndance, and a high(prenominal) education achievement. By breaking uniforms in school they will be able to identify trespassers and setting a obedient example for the students who are serious round school work and their studies, and also discourages the activities of gang members and the tensions that result from wearing gang clothing attire (Boutelle, 2008). Opponents touch there is not enough evidence to support the relationship mingled with the uniforms and discipline or uniforms and students achievement. According to Brunsma (2006, p. 85), he suggest that uniform policies whitethorn caterd serve as a band-aid in dealing with the problems of schools and whitethorn alone stand politymakers a way to avoid making the decisions take to reform public education. at one time the question is, Would Delaware public elementary schools wellbeing greatly if this polity were adopted? Resistance is always a factor when trying to make changes. slightly parents and students whi tethorn not want the school uniforms for a variety of reasons. If the parents and students realize that uniforms will arrive at them in the commodious run they whitethorn change their minds.There are m on the whole advantages to school uniforms, including academic advantages, social outcomes, behavioral issues, preventative and cost of uniforms. Research is needed because elementary schools will turn a profit more if they had a school uniform polity obligate. Literature Review schoolhouse uniforms entertain been the cause of more jokes and harassment to those who wore them. In the past, public schools considered uniforms old and out dated trends, though recently numerous public schools are starting to implement and utilise a uniform constitution.The implementation of a school uniform policy is important if we are still striving to improve our students. The arguments against them are melt part the positive reasons for promoting school uniforms are gaining ground. Some of the possible benefits are safety, cost, uniformity and madness in academics instead of fashions. According to Boutelle (2008), school uniforms in todays society promote school safety and evoke the learning environment, and diminish the clothing completion (p. 3). civilize uniforms unify a school and help the blending of the school cultures, instead of separating the students.A retentive with school uniforms there is a boost in academic performance. With the United States move behind other developed nation ranking in at number 18 of 24 (Boutelle, 2007), this is low for a nation that is outgo a lot on education e very year. Students are losing way on school and are competing for what the youthfulfangledest fashion or gadget rather than concentrate oning on school these days. With the addition of school uniforms in American society, students can focalisation more on their classes rather than social factors that students digest on when there is no school uniform and the dress code is not strict.With the addition of school uniforms in public schools students are attach together helping each other encounter like they are accepted and part of a much bigger picture than beneficial them. Everyone wearing uniforms also makes it very easy to recognize pile who are not supposed to be there or can make an intruder stand out in a crowd. The Department of teaching gave out manuals to all of the nations 16,000 school districts with suggestions to make school uniforms mandatory and model programs that are in a few public schools (Brunsma, 119).Reasons for implementing uniforms included reduce peer pressure, emergence school pride, gear focus more to learning, assist in discipline problems, and create a more work-like atmosphere with little distractions and expense. Schools that set active significant problems are mostly probably to induce school uniforms. Having a soundly overlap of a zero-tolerance policies and school uniform policies do not need the security guards, metal detectors, sign-in policies, or the limited restroom time (Brunsma, p. 51).M all parents are faced with the predicament of outfitting their kidskinren in the latest trends or putting money towards more important things like thriftiness for their childrens college education. Some families are futile to afford the popular named blur clothing that their children desires, which make the children, feel incapable in school when they are forced to wear lesser in mentionr clothes. Granted, the cost whitethorn be a bit more self-colored in the beginning, further the uniforms will last weeklong which means there is less out-of-pocket expense for replacement articles.With uniforms, the parents whitethorn tho dumbfound to purchase two or three sets compared to several pairs of bottoms and tops. Uniforms are more durable and can be washed more frequently compared to systematic clothes. This makes them the unwrap option not only for lower income families , still all families in general. Parents claim that uniforms will cost the families more money in the long run because parents will be forced to deprave the uniforms and repair clothing for their children to wear when they are not in school. The cost for parents whitethorn double that of estimable sullying traditional school clothes.Although this is partly accepted up that parents would be faced making additional purchases for their children, in reality, should still be expenditure less money. Since uniforms are more durable, the parents only need to defile a limited supply and since the children will only be wearing their fifty-fifty clothes outside of school, parents will not fork up to vitiate as m both outfits. Most children wear out their clothes objet dart in school. Since this is not an issue with the uniforms because they are worn during school hours only the traditional street clothes will last weeklong, hence relieve the parents money in the long run.Also wit hout the constant contention in schools, children may not feel the need to have the latest brands and styles as they would if they were wearing the clothes to school on a daily posterior around other social classes. There are some objections to having children wear uniforms in school. The most popular one is the price of the uniforms sometimes they may cost a lot depending on the comp all from which they are purchased. If the school does not go through a certain company but just asks the parents to demoralise certain colored shirts and heave, with no form f a logo on them, this would help make the cost of the uniform a lot less. Also, if the parents financially could not afford to buy the uniforms, whence the parents would have to show proof of this and file for help with school board, which could provide them with a small grant to be used on the uniforms. In California, parents from low-income families are entitled to financial help and are able to detect assistance in purchas ing the uniforms (Konheim-Kalkstein, 2006). Lake Forest School District in Delaware does not supplement the cost of the uniforms to low income families but if a child is in need they do go case by case.The school nurse keeps uniforms on stock and the local church also supplies the uniforms (Ms. Lands). instantlys style of uniforms is more relaxed than what they were before. The boys would wear dark slacks, white shirts and a tie and the girls wore a traditional blazer, white blouse and a plaid skirt. at a time they can wear khaki heave or blue jeans with a white T-shirt, denim shirt or skirts. The largest manufacture french goner has more than 4,000 school uniform items (Anderson, 2004). On the french wrinkle. com website short sleeve dress shirts with collar for boys cost $9. 98, pants $16. 8 and for girls the blouses and skirts are $9. 98 and pants are $14. 98. If parents could get them on sale they would defiantly save money. French Toast has a Dollar in Uniform fundraising event exit on right now if the parents order from their website than the school they select will get a five percent cash back. Not only do mandatory uniform policies for public schools offer the potential for higher educational benefits and improved student discipline, school uniforms dissolve social boundaries in the midst of classmates. Students are no longer judged establish off their appearance but by who they are on the inside.There is no more competition betwixt social classes that these students may have otherwise felt and they work together as a team and share a habitual pride. All students will feel a sense of belonging. No longer will lower income children be labeled as poor base on their clothing. All children will appear as equals in the schoolroom and will be treated as such (Viadero, 2005). School force-out can be greatly reduced by the use of school uniforms. With kids ineffectual to noticeably tell or distinguish which kids belong to what gangs in school if a ny at all.Also, with uniforms its much harder to tell which kids come are wealthy and which kids come from needy families. This can relieve kids of the latent hostility that social economic status can bring. With uniforms children blend, which helps kids see who the actual mortal is rather then who or where they came from or what their culture is or background. Stepping into any public school with a normal dress code during tiffin is evidence of the different groups in a school including different educational and social statuses. Some school gangs separate themselves by their clothes.At any moment there could be a confrontation between any of these groups and instantly a conflict has started or worse school violence could happen between tribe. When something happens everything is stopped until the situation gets resolved whether its gloomy up by the school cop, teachers, or resolved between the people it happened between. Some of this can be stopped, as Bill Clinton said in his 1996 State of man and wife Address I challenge all our schools to teach character education, to teach good values and good citizenship.And if it means that stripling will stop killing each other over couturier jackets, then our public schools should be able to require their students to wear school uniform. In the first year of using school uniform big Beach, California, the school officials found that suspensions dropped by 28 percent assault and barrage decreased 34 percent fighting decreased 56 percent sex offenses decreased 74 percent vandalism decreased 18 percent and school crime decreased 86 percent (Brunsma, p. 36). With less violence in the school, more students want to come to school.Therefore more students would be more worryed in firing to school (Konheim-Kalkstein, 2006). RESULTS The school uniforms maybe a means of improving our efforts to help students in becoming healthier, making them a better citizen in their participation and being an hobby in our society . Realizing that the success of this policy may depend on each individual school system and their needs, and knowing a school uniform policy is not good for every school is of utmost importance. The studies that have been done have lacked the evidence that supports the school uniforms. Some schools might benefit from a school uniform policy.When adopting a school uniform policy many another(prenominal) schools also adopted other new programs at the self alike(p)(prenominal) time. It was unclear as to what exactly created the successes that were notable in the studies. DISCUSSION School Uniforms affect schools in a better way, appears that only when the school and fraternity have done inquiry and done their homework. The sure-fire schools first compiled reasons for lacking school uniforms and then decided if they were relevant or not. There were surveys taken of staff, parents and the community to find out what the level of support was for the administration if they had to e mploy a school uniform policy.Several steps were conducting and it appeared to work for many school districts. It is important to listen to everyone concerning the adoption of a uniform policy (Brunsma, 2006, p. 116). Slowly moving to give the community time to think about the positives and negatives of their decision is must. When lacking(p) to implement the uniforms the style and nature should be considered as well the school history (McBrayer, p. 126). The students should always be complicated in the decision making and choices, but they may not make the closing decision.Parents and schools need to decide what is safest and healthiest for all and not just the individual. There were other changes incorporated in the schools at the same time the school uniform policy was adopted. Some examples of the changes that took place with the uniform policy adoptions were changes in the curriculum, new problems solving curriculums, more teachers in the hallways between classes, and new di scipline procedures. Changes are continuous and therefore it is difficult to only rely on one at a time. It is a very difficult job for administrators to develop safe and healthy schools.However, there are times that an administrator may determine a factor in the success of the schools dress code, no dress code, or uniform policy. Consistency is very important part of keeping the students safe. CONCLUSION For the support of school uniforms the research of evidence, or the lack thereof, it is recommended that each school districts review the information concerning school uniform policies. Probably what would be best is observing a school that already has uniforms. Members snarly should observe a school similar to their proclaim rural, urban or suburban, size and community standards.Members should also recognize and consider steps taken by other schools when they first enforced the school uniforms. It is very important to learn as much as they can about mistakes that took place at the other schools and consider possible prosperous alternatives. When putting a school uniform policy into effect everyone involved should have a disputeion with the community including the students. Parents, students, administrators, teachers, support staff, and board members are all part of the community and should have a decision in the terminal decision.In the decision making they need to also talk of the prices of the uniforms and if there is going to be help for the ones who cannot afford paying for them. The early of our society depends on confident, inclusive, and caring people focused on valuing the skills, abilities and talents of all the decision makers. I believe that all students deserve a safe learning environment. School uniforms might be the best solutions to the public elementary schools education needs to stop the competitiveness of clothes and create better learning environments in students achievements and positive social outcomes. Anderson, W. 2004, Februar y). School dress codes and uniform policies. College of fosterage, University of Oregon. Eric Digest, 148. Boutelle, M. (2008, February). Uniforms Are They a Good Fit? reading Digest, 73, 34-37. Brunsma, D. (2004). The school uniform parkway and what it tells us about American education. atomic number 101 Rowman and Littlefield raising. Brunsma, D. ( 2006, Jan/Feb). School uniform policies in public school. Principal, 85, 50-53. Brunsma, D. (2006). Uniforms in public schools A decade of research and debate. Maryland Rowman and Littlefield Education. Darden, E. (2008, January). What Not to Wear.American School advance Journal, 195, 36-37. French Toast Official School Wear http//frenchtoast. com/jump. jsp? itemID=0&itemType=HOME_PAGE&cobrand=www. frenchtoast. com Konheim-Kalkstein, Y. (2006, August). A uniform look. American School bill of fare Journal, 193, 25-27. McBrayer, S. (2007, September). The school uniform safari and what it tells us about American education A Symboli c Crusade. Catholic Education A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 11, 124-126. Viadero, D. (2005, January). Uniform effects? Schools evoke benefits of student uniforms, but researchers see little evidence of effectiveness. Education Week, 24, 27-29.School UniformSchool Uniforms Should Students in Public Schools Wear Uniforms? Abstract adept of the most controversial issues in public school is the school uniforms. In 1996, the issue of school uniforms was bought to the forefront in President Clinton State of the Union address. People argue that uniforms can make schools safer and improve attendance and increase students achievement. People opposing school uniforms argue that it has not been proven to work with discipline, attendance or the students achievement. The propose of this research is to find out if school uniforms will work in all elementary public schools.Do the students and their parents want a change in their school district attempting to control many aspects, attendanc e, academic achievement, self-esteem, safety and violence? Interested in positive changes in the students success and achievement may want to consider school uniform policy in their school district. School Uniforms Uniforms in public elementary schools can have an impact on the students and on the school system. The students can focus more on their classes rather than social factors that students focus on when there is no school uniform and the dress code is not strict.There is no competition between peers to outdo each other when wearing uniforms. Some parents complain that uniforms are too costly for them, but uniforms are in reality more affordable and there are fewer clothes to buy because everyone will be dressed in similar clothing. There are also ways to help low-income families with the cost. The school can set up funding for low income families to help pay for the uniforms for their children in the form of donations, clothing vouchers, and support from the business partner s of the communities this problem can be overcome.The thrift stores and uniform supply houses also reduce the cost for the clothing. These things combined can make it far less costly to purchase standard clothing than to stir the demand for designer clothing worn now. Many private schools have required uniforms for a number of years and now public schools are adopting the school uniform policy. With Long Beach, California being the first large urban school district to enforce uniforms to all students in Kindergarten through eighth grade in 1995.In 1999, New York City enforced uniforms in 70 percent of their schools. In 2000, Philadelphia enforced the uniforms district total and 60 percent in Miami and 80 percent in clams (Konheim-Kalkstein, 2006). Since then school uniforms in public schools are becoming increasingly popular across the nation. Several other states have already implement uniform policies in Texas, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Los Angeles, Michigan, Florida, Utah, India na, Louisiana, Maryland, Tennessee, Virginia, and District of Columbia.Many large public school systems including Baltimore, Cincinnati, Dayton, Detroit, Los Angeles, Memphis, Milwaukee, Nashville, New Orleans, Phoenix, Seattle and St. Louis have schools with either voluntary or mandatory uniform policies, mostly in elementary and middle schools (Brunsma, 2006). Advocates believe that the uniform policies have great benefits. They believe that it eliminates conflict over expensive items of clothing and has a business-like atmosphere to the school (Darden, p. 36).They also think that the uniforms will make schools safer, improve attendance, and a higher education achievement. By wearing uniforms in school they will be able to identify trespassers and setting a good example for the students who are serious about school work and their studies, and also discourages the activities of gang members and the tensions that result from wearing gang clothing attire (Boutelle, 2008). Opponents f eel there is not enough evidence to support the relationship between the uniforms and discipline or uniforms and students achievement. According to Brunsma (2006, p. 85), he suggest that uniform policies may only serve as a band-aid in dealing with the problems of schools and may only provide policymakers a way to avoid making the decisions inevitable to reform public education. Now the question is, Would Delaware public elementary schools benefit greatly if this policy were adopted? Resistance is always a factor when trying to make changes. Some parents and students may not want the school uniforms for a variety of reasons. If the parents and students realize that uniforms will benefit them in the long run they may change their minds.There are many advantages to school uniforms, including academic advantages, social outcomes, behavioral issues, safety and cost of uniforms. Research is needed because elementary schools will benefit more if they had a school uniform policy enforced . Literature Review School uniforms have been the cause of many jokes and harassment to those who wore them. In the past, public schools considered uniforms old and out dated trends, though recently many public schools are starting to implement and enforce a uniform policy.The implementation of a school uniform policy is important if we are still striving to improve our students. The arguments against them are attenuation while the positive reasons for promoting school uniforms are gaining ground. Some of the possible benefits are safety, cost, uniformity and violence in academics instead of fashions. According to Boutelle (2008), school uniforms in todays society promote school safety and nurture the learning environment, and diminish the clothing completion (p. 3). School uniforms unify a school and help the blending of the school cultures, instead of separating the students.Along with school uniforms there is a boost in academic performance. With the United States drop behind o ther developed nation ranking in at number 18 of 24 (Boutelle, 2007), this is low for a nation that is spending a lot on education every year. Students are losing focus on school and are competing for what the newest fashion or gadget rather than focusing on school these days. With the addition of school uniforms in American society, students can focus more on their classes rather than social factors that students focus on when there is no school uniform and the dress code is not strict.With the addition of school uniforms in public schools students are adhere together helping each other feel like they are accepted and part of a much bigger picture than just them. Everyone wearing uniforms also makes it very easy to recognize people who are not supposed to be there or can make an intruder stand out in a crowd. The Department of Education gave out manuals to all of the nations 16,000 school districts with suggestions to make school uniforms mandatory and model programs that are in a few public schools (Brunsma, 119).Reasons for implementing uniforms included reduce peer pressure, increase school pride, gear focus more to learning, assist in discipline problems, and create a more work-like atmosphere with less distractions and expense. Schools that have significant problems are mostly likely to have school uniforms. Having a good overlap of a zero-tolerance policies and school uniform policies do not need the security guards, metal detectors, sign-in policies, or the limited restroom time (Brunsma, p. 51).Many parents are faced with the quandary of outfitting their children in the latest trends or putting money towards more important things like saving for their childrens college education. Some families are unable to afford the popular named brand clothing that their children desires, which make the children, feel light in school when they are forced to wear lesser brand clothes. Granted, the cost may be a bit more comforting in the beginning, but the unifor ms will last longer which means there is less out-of-pocket expense for replacement articles.With uniforms, the parents may only have to purchase two or three sets compared to several pairs of bottoms and tops. Uniforms are more durable and can be washed more frequently compared to well-ordered clothes. This makes them the better option not only for lower income families, but all families in general. Parents claim that uniforms will cost the families more money in the long run because parents will be forced to buy the uniforms and regular clothing for their children to wear when they are not in school. The cost for parents may double that of just buying traditional school clothes.Although this is partly true that parents would be faced making additional purchases for their children, in reality, should still be spending less money. Since uniforms are more durable, the parents only need to buy a limited supply and since the children will only be wearing their regular clothes outside of school, parents will not have to buy as many outfits. Most children wear out their clothes while in school. Since this is not an issue with the uniforms because they are worn during school hours only the traditional street clothes will last longer, hence saving the parents money in the long run.Also without the constant competition in schools, children may not feel the need to have the latest brands and styles as they would if they were wearing the clothes to school on a daily can around other social classes. There are some objections to having children wear uniforms in school. The most popular one is the price of the uniforms sometimes they may cost a lot depending on the company from which they are purchased. If the school does not go through a certain company but just asks the parents to buy certain colored shirts and pants, with no form f a logo on them, this would help make the cost of the uniform a lot less. Also, if the parents financially could not afford to buy the unif orms, then the parents would have to show proof of this and file for help with school board, which could provide them with a small grant to be used on the uniforms. In California, parents from low-income families are entitled to financial help and are able to encounter assistance in purchasing the uniforms (Konheim-Kalkstein, 2006). Lake Forest School District in Delaware does not supplement the cost of the uniforms to low income families but if a child is in need they do go case by case.The school nurse keeps uniforms on stock and the local church also supplies the uniforms (Ms. Lands). like a shots style of uniforms is more relaxed than what they were before. The boys would wear dark slacks, white shirts and a tie and the girls wore a traditional blazer, white blouse and a plaid skirt. Now they can wear khaki pants or blue jeans with a white T-shirt, denim shirt or skirts. The largest manufacture French Toast has more than 4,000 school uniform items (Anderson, 2004). On the Fren chToast. com website short sleeve dress shirts with collar for boys cost $9. 98, pants $16. 8 and for girls the blouses and skirts are $9. 98 and pants are $14. 98. If parents could get them on sale they would defiantly save money. French Toast has a Dollar in Uniform fundraising event going on right now if the parents order from their website than the school they select will get a five percent cash back. Not only do mandatory uniform policies for public schools offer the potential for higher educational benefits and improved student discipline, school uniforms dissolve social boundaries between classmates. Students are no longer judged based off their appearance but by who they are on the inside.There is no more competition between social classes that these students may have otherwise felt and they work together as a team and share a greenness pride. All students will feel a sense of belonging. No longer will lower income children be labeled as poor based on their clothing. All ch ildren will appear as equals in the classroom and will be treated as such (Viadero, 2005). School violence can be greatly reduced by the use of school uniforms. With kids unable to noticeably tell or distinguish which kids belong to what gangs in school if any at all.Also, with uniforms its much harder to tell which kids come are wealthy and which kids come from needy families. This can relieve kids of the judge that social economic status can bring. With uniforms children blend, which helps kids see who the actual psyche is rather then who or where they came from or what their culture is or background. Stepping into any public school with a normal dress code during dejeuner is evidence of the different groups in a school including different educational and social statuses. Some school gangs separate themselves by their clothes.At any moment there could be a confrontation between any of these groups and instantly a conflict has started or worse school violence could happen betwee n people. When something happens everything is stopped until the situation gets resolved whether its low-spirited up by the school cop, teachers, or resolved between the people it happened between. Some of this can be stopped, as Bill Clinton said in his 1996 State of Union Address I challenge all our schools to teach character education, to teach good values and good citizenship.And if it means that teenager will stop killing each other over designer jackets, then our public schools should be able to require their students to wear school uniform. In the first year of using school uniform Long Beach, California, the school officials found that suspensions dropped by 28 percent assault and bombardment decreased 34 percent fighting decreased 56 percent sex offenses decreased 74 percent vandalism decreased 18 percent and school crime decreased 86 percent (Brunsma, p. 36). With less violence in the school, more students want to come to school.Therefore more students would be more int erested in going to school (Konheim-Kalkstein, 2006). RESULTS The school uniforms maybe a means of improving our efforts to help students in becoming healthier, making them a better citizen in their community and being an interest in our society. Realizing that the success of this policy may depend on each individual school system and their needs, and knowing a school uniform policy is not good for every school is of utmost importance. The studies that have been done have lacked the evidence that supports the school uniforms. Some schools might benefit from a school uniform policy.When adopting a school uniform policy many schools also adopted other new programs at the same time. It was unclear as to what exactly created the successes that were notable in the studies. DISCUSSION School Uniforms affect schools in a better way, appears that only when the school and community have done research and done their homework. The successful schools first compiled reasons for wanting school un iforms and then decided if they were relevant or not. There were surveys taken of staff, parents and the community to find out what the level of support was for the administration if they had to enforce a school uniform policy.Several steps were conducting and it appeared to work for many school districts. It is important to listen to everyone concerning the adoption of a uniform policy (Brunsma, 2006, p. 116). Slowly moving to give the community time to think about the positives and negatives of their decision is must. When wanting to implement the uniforms the style and nature should be considered as well the school history (McBrayer, p. 126). The students should always be involved in the decision making and choices, but they may not make the final decision.Parents and schools need to decide what is safest and healthiest for all and not just the individual. There were other changes incorporated in the schools at the same time the school uniform policy was adopted. Some examples of the changes that took place with the uniform policy adoptions were changes in the curriculum, new problems solving curriculums, more teachers in the hallways between classes, and new discipline procedures. Changes are continuous and therefore it is difficult to only rely on one at a time. It is a very difficult job for administrators to develop safe and healthy schools.However, there are times that an administrator may determine a factor in the success of the schools dress code, no dress code, or uniform policy. Consistency is very important part of keeping the students safe. CONCLUSION For the support of school uniforms the research of evidence, or the lack thereof, it is recommended that each school districts review the information concerning school uniform policies. Probably what would be best is observing a school that already has uniforms. Members involved should observe a school similar to their own rural, urban or suburban, size and community standards.Members should also re cognize and consider steps taken by other schools when they first enforced the school uniforms. It is very important to learn as much as they can about mistakes that took place at the other schools and consider possible successful alternatives. When putting a school uniform policy into effect everyone involved should have a discussion with the community including the students. Parents, students, administrators, teachers, support staff, and board members are all part of the community and should have a decision in the final decision.In the decision making they need to also discuss the prices of the uniforms and if there is going to be help for the ones who cannot afford paying for them. The future of our society depends on confident, inclusive, and caring people focused on valuing the skills, abilities and talents of all the decision makers. I believe that all students deserve a safe learning environment. School uniforms might be the best solutions to the public elementary schools ed ucation needs to stop the competitiveness of clothes and create better learning environments in students achievements and positive social outcomes. Anderson, W. 2004, February). School dress codes and uniform policies. College of Education, University of Oregon. Eric Digest, 148. Boutelle, M. (2008, February). Uniforms Are They a Good Fit? Education Digest, 73, 34-37. Brunsma, D. (2004). The school uniform movement and what it tells us about American education. Maryland Rowman and Littlefield Education. Brunsma, D. ( 2006, Jan/Feb). School uniform policies in public school. Principal, 85, 50-53. Brunsma, D. (2006). Uniforms in public schools A decade of research and debate. Maryland Rowman and Littlefield Education. Darden, E. (2008, January). What Not to Wear.American School Board Journal, 195, 36-37. French Toast Official School Wear http//frenchtoast. com/jump. jsp? itemID=0&itemType=HOME_PAGE&cobrand=www. frenchtoast. com Konheim-Kalkstein, Y. (2006, August). A uniform look. Ame rican School Board Journal, 193, 25-27. McBrayer, S. (2007, September). The school uniform movement and what it tells us about American education A Symbolic Crusade. Catholic Education A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 11, 124-126. Viadero, D. (2005, January). Uniform effects? Schools cite benefits of student uniforms, but researchers see little evidence of effectiveness. Education Week, 24, 27-29.