Comparing The End of the Imagination and The Redfern Speech Essay

Comparing The End of the Imagination and The Redfern Speech - Essay ExampleArundhati Roy and capital of Minnesota Keating, to convince the au transcendnce to look at in what they are saying, utilize the strategy of adding emotional appeal to their evidence, and by doing so, has struck the deepest cord of their heart. It is not only the evidence, but the emotions and imagination attached to the evidence, which helps Roy and Keating to win the hearts of the audience, and hence, it leave behind not be wrong to say that it is the emotions, and not just the evidence, that helps person to convince others in the make for of communication. Arundhati Roy In her essay The end of the imagination, Arundhati Roy has expressed her strong views against the atomic tests conducted by Government of India in 1998. Roy has taken aid of strong evidence, through facts, reasoning and future possibilities, to convince the audience about her disapproval to contendds the nuclear tests. The evidence that Roy has used to convince the audience are discussed below. The consequences of nuclear war The first strategy that Roy has used to prove her stand against the nuclear testing by Indian government is the description of the consequences of the nuclear war. Roy has describe the horrors of nuclear war in a vivid language. Instead of just using the words evil or harmful, she has clearly described how the villages, rivers, wind and human body will be affected by the nuclear war. This vivid description gives a feeling of the horrors of nuclear war and creates a clear date of its consequences. The picture of what really happens after the nuclear war, and how it affects the environment and human beings, shocks the reader. Hence, the clarity of the effects of nuclear war on human body, the atmosphere, on future generation through poisonous radiations and the effects on environment, whole shebang as a strong evidence to prove why she is against the nuclear testing. The second evidence Roy uses is by questioning the sanity of men who can get access to the nuclear weapons. Suicide bomber brainpower Indian government had given deterrence as a reason for their decision to go frontwards with nuclear testing. However, Roy has argued that the theory of deterrence has flaws in it. She has questioned Indian Governments agreement of the enemy. Roy feels that one cannot figure the enemy to be similar to self. That is, she has expressed her concern over the terrorist groups who are not deterred by the nuclear capacity of the enemy as they have a different psyche. She discusses the psychology of terrorists who are ready to die in order to kill. She calls this a suicide bomber psyche. Terrorists are so strongly brainwashed to believe in their cause that they do not hesitate even a bit to destroy themselves in order to prove their point. They are ready to perish, and are insane enough to destroy millions of lives. Roy says that if the nuclear bomb gets in hands of such people, then the theory of deterrence, proves baseless. To convince this point, she has provided the evidence of death of Rajiv Gandhi. Rajiv Gandhi, the Prime curate of India, was assassinated by suicide bomber. Using his assassination as evidence, Roy questions the Indian Governments understanding about the enemy psyche. Roy questions that when even a man of premiere stature like Rajiv Gandhi was not save by the