Relating the social exchange theory to increasing divorce rates Essay

Relating the fond ex miscellany guess to increasing divorce rates - Essay ExampleThese figures show that this phenomenon is almost universal. While trying to look the increasing divorce rates based on social exchange conjecture, the analysis has to consider as its variables, cost, benefit, outcome, comparison level, satisfaction, and dependence inside the institution of marriage (Clarke-Stewart and Brentano, 20-21). This has to be so because these are the yardsticks to measure change or stability in a system, as prescribed by the social exchange theory. The theory suggests that after marriage, people evaluate their relationship in terms of costs and benefits (Clarke-Stewart and Brentano, 20). And the survival of the marriage is ensured and when the costs like additional work, additional responsibilities, sacramental manduction of personal things etc. are balanced by the benefits that include love, support, companionship, emotional security, social status and connections, and se xual relations, as well as property, financial resources and financial aid with daily tasks (Clarke-Stewart and Brentano, 20). ... So, according to social exchange theory, if alternative attractions and resources are stronger as compared to the rewards, divorce happens. In general, social exchange theory presupposes that all interpersonal behavior including dating, marriage and family relationships, is assumed to involve a execute of negotiation and bargaining (Baker, 78). Usually from a social scientists common perspective, the reasons for divorce can be delays in age at first marriage, rising non-marital cohabitation, and increases in non-marital births and overly womens growing teaching method and economic independence, a even out in religious influence, an increase in individualism, and a corresponding decline in communalism (Lamb, 196). The risk factors that bring about a divorce as identified by researchers also constitute a very long list (qtd. In Lamb, 197). This list i ncludes, factors like Marrying a teenager, cosmos poor, having a low level of education, having no children from the marriage, bringing children from a previous union into the marriage, being in a second or higher order marriage, cohabiting prior to marriage, having no religious affiliation, not sharing the same religion with ones spouse, living in an urban area, and growing up in a household without two continuously married parents (Lamb, 197-198). Other findings of social science research in this regard have suggested that education has a positive association with the risk of divorce (qtd. by Lamb, 198). many more immediate causative factors of divorce have been identified as well. These comprise of frequent arguments, perennial expressions of negative affect, domestic